 |
|
Nov 25, 2005
Texas vs. USC? A little work to do for both teams, I see...
Well, Texas showed me that playing an emotion-laidened in-state rivalry (despite my not feeling that they played very well defensively), that they have work to do.
Um.... they have "gaps" to care for on their defense, hello.
Texas A&M, with two weeks to prepare for this game, obviously sought and succeeded upon finding some beneficial holes within the Texas defense by game-tape, despite not winning (40-29, Texas).
The game was r.e.a.l. - ly not as close as the score seemed to indicate by some estimates, but Texas should use this game (and tape) as an indicator of what they likely will face (by their shown game weaknesses) against USC.
They, the Texas team in total, allowed Texas A&M to hang around' way, way too long.
Two things will go 'round and 'round in preparation of a time-prepared title game. USC will go after the Texas defense (point nonetheless delivered as obvious with 'that' USC offense) and especially the A&M holes delivered today; the things that time preparation are benefits of (A&M had two weeks to prepare - USC would have more).
"Holes" are already, and have been delivered at times in USC's mighty-mouse-not defense, but there is more on the table now in seeing the Longhorn's defense today. The Longhorn defense has been really good in previous terms, but today showed more 'chasing' than the Janet Jackson's version of usual, "Control !".
Wasn't that the song that once sped: "First time I fell in love, I didn't know what hit me
So young and so naive, I thought it would be easy; Now I know I got to take"?!!!
Feeling me now?
Eh, Mack, get your team better prepared, buddy. If Reggie Bush or Dwayne Jarrett were to get outside on a quickly designed play, you are ,"chasing" on defense, partner; in fact, calling "ghostbusters" in a hopeful high scoring game that you will (by odds of most) lose.
The Big 12 title game is your refuge, Texas, make it work for the better for the "Yellow Rose"'s sake, one better than the Red-Rose'd event that you'll be undertaking in likelihood of the college football timed game.
-Chuck Kellerman, reporting for the CollegeSportsClub-
Posted at 10:03 pm by Chuck Kellerman
Permalink
Oct 18, 2005
It's That Time of Year Again
October...
The nights are getting colder. The leaves are starting to turn. Baseball is slowly making its way towards another Fall Classic. And sportswriters everywhere are dusting off their trusty "BSC SUX" and "We Need a Playoff!" stories.
Why are these sad, old, recycled stories suddenly being dumped in our laps again? Because its BCS time again!
In case you somehow didn't notice, yet another year (the eighth by my count) of BCS rankings debuted on Monday. Predictably, USC and Texas held the top two spots. Also predictably, the whining started in earnest. You know the arguments: "The BCS 'fails' every year, how will it fail this time?" or "A playoff is 'needed', that will solve all our problems."
Well, maybe I'm the only one left who actually believes this, but there is nothing wrong with the concept of the BCS. It has never failed. Let's approach these points one after the other:
First, the concept of the BCS is fine. The formula may not be right after eight years of tweaking, but the concept of picking the best two of (now) 119 contenders and having them play for the title remains sound. College Football is a season-long, single-elimination tournament; adding more layers would only dilute what is today a fantastic product.
Second, and I can't stress this enough, the BCS has never 'failed'. The BCS was developed after the 1997 season to select and match up the best two teams from a field of contenders in the least biased way possible. It has done just that every time. You may argue that USC deserved to play in the 2003 Sugar Bowl or Auburn deserved to play in the 2004 Orange Bowl but that doesn't mean the system itself did not work. If you want to argue that the current formula has brought too much bias back into the process, I'm right there with you. But you can't argue that the system hasn't done what it was designed to do.
So as we turn towards home in another excellent, way-too-short College Football season, let's try to enjoy what we have rather than pine for what might never be. Let's talk about what's great about this sport rather than write yet another re-hashed story on why the BCS isn't a playoff.
Posted at 07:35 pm by stickman721
Permalink
Oct 4, 2005
Oklahoma vs. Texas: More marbles running than on the usual game
USC should have an eye on what happens in this game because Texas could very well be a down-the-road opponent for them.
This game, by nature and all of it's it's billed hype, normally can be constructed of any inclusion to throwing away both teams' records to seasonal date. Oklahoma has owned the Texas Longhorns for the past five, count 'em, five engagements between the two teams - - records unseeming in affection for one-another.
I've learned to stop doubting this Texas team since my admissions of their fortune in late 2004 and into the 2005 college football bowl records with Michigan. That was a coming-out party for one Texas QB, Vincent Young.
But this is 2005, and there is quite a separation between the paths of which these two teams have traveled thus far.
To make it short, the Texas Longhorns survived a true test at Columbus, OH., in defeating the Buckeyes of, "The Ohio State University."
The Sooners of Oklahoma hang their simple hat based on last weeks win, albeit in some considerable fashion, over formerly undefeated, but unrecognized, Kansas State. That game ended with OU winning in a lopsided 43-21 kind-of-way.
The win for OU came after a perhaps breath-freshening bye week, which appears to have done them some good.
The Sooners have losses to TCU (17-10) and UCLA (41-24) prior to their break of seemingly (at the time) 'near' good-riddance.
So, I ask, who wins this game? Is it the hopeful newfound OU Sooners? Or is it the longer-reaching Vince Young-led 'Horns of those mighty Texas Longhorns?
I'm taking the Longhorns along the similar lines of the oddsmakers with two-touchdown favoritism. I'm no dummy - and I cannot trust that Oklahoma has turned it around so quickly...
-Chuck-
Posted at 05:21 am by Chuck Kellerman
Permalink
Nov 26, 2004
Texas... are they worthy of the BCS?
The Univ. of Texas football program just finished the proving part of their season in convincing way. They just polished-off Texas A&M, 26-13, in a finalized enough state to grandly yell-out to the BCS for an at-large bid.
Hey 'ya'll !'
Texas coach Mack Brown almost seems in some sort of political running and asks, "If you've got a vote, vote for us." Brown continues his starting of the horse-race strategy in saying, "I'm asking you to do that and I'm asking everyone across the nation. This team deserves to be in the BCS."
Was it Bush/Cheney in the last political olympics, or Bush/Brown?
Texas' nemesis, you ask?
In the AP Poll, (#4-BCS) California and (#5-AP) Utah are still standing in the way of the Longhorns. Utah leads Texas (10-1) in the AP by the slighest of margins (17 points) for 5th place. While 5th place could conceivably be big for UT as many suggest, it, in my opinion, likely will not be enough unless Cal loses or goes real sour in a last-week victory. Cal has an .8504 to .8301 lead over UT in the BCS. That is A.K.A. for: A LOT at this time of the year.
Texas currently resides in the #5 BCS and the #6 AP Poll positions, with all stated.
Their only hiccup from being in the biggest game within the land perhaps? Oklahoma, in a 12-0 game. No wonder the Longhorns and Sooners dislike one-another...
Dec. 4th, Cal plays their final game (a Hurricane postponement) at a mediocre Southern Miss (5-4). If you are a Longhorns fan, don't look for much optimism in the Golden Eagles getting by this Bears team of Cal.
Does a blind squirrel find a nut every one-in-while?
Sure.
Texas doesn't even have any squirrels here unless the college football world caves-in via the surprise of a Southern Mississippi Hurricane. The Univ. of Texas Longhorns will play in a nice Bowl game, however.
Congrats to the Texas Longhorn football program for the Hanging-in-there Award!
Posted at 11:29 pm by Chuck Kellerman
Permalink
Oct 31, 2004
A newborn team on the horizon: UTEP
I have completed some thinking on the subject of the UTEP Miners, that is, the Univ. of Texas at El Paso (TX).
They have always seemingly been a terrible football program, but as of late, are becoming a positive story in college football athletics behind Head Coach Mike Price.
A familiar name, Mike Price was the brief-termed Head Coach at Alabama until strip club allegations surfaced. Price is also known however, for lifting programs from failure at Weber St. and Washington St.
As proof-positive, I today offer that they have reached their first goal as a program, a 6-2 record and their first top 25 ranking since 1988 (#25, AP).
Oh, how minor, when one looks back in the history of this program, could a Miner have been.
Where is El Paso, Texas? In Mexico? Oh yes, I see, it is at the very tip of western Texas, next to the state of New Mexico.
I bet that overwhelmes recruiting efforts, not to fail in mentioning, the high school recruits resemblance of tropical beauty, big campus style of setting that they see on other visits.
You know, the things that tend to "woo" some young athletic guys into signing their talents away on the NCAA, blood-dotted line.
In 2001, the Miners were a paltry 2-9 in record. In 2002 and 2003, the Miners went, respectively, 2-10 and 2-11, only winning games through those years by near-forfeiture of opponent strength and NCAA divisional level.
So, they had nothing going for them, right?
Yes, the days of the past can be a thing of assimilative beauty, can they not?
And, very sweet as some could see it in this case.
Every program has to start from the bottom of the barrel, and as fans, we are so unwilling to have the patience for what isn't the forefront of headlines. We do not have to experience this by majority, because we naturally assemble our sports loyalties to programs that are either natural winners, or we saw ourselves going to college there.
There are other reasons why we attach to programs, however, they are closer to the 'bandwagon' variety, in some opinions. You might call me one of those fans, just of a different variety. Maybe one of the thought, 'Underdogs-R-Us', in best terms.
In the El Paso Miners football sports lives, 'patience is (and has to have been) of a virtue'. They must now have so much emotional release in terms of appreciation, that college 'spewing enthusiasm' might be an understatement on a back-road Saturday evening around El Paso, Texas.
Everyone might wish upon their "lucky star" for this UTEP program to keep it, 'up to par' with the rest of college football, and to keep the WAC Conference balanced.
With a little luck, they just might turn into a powerful program, year in and year out.
Posted at 08:18 pm by Chuck Kellerman
Permalink
Oct 13, 2004
FSU/UVa Early ACC Elimination Game
The ACC should have one less competetor for the conference title after this week's Florida State/Virginia game in Tallahassee. Obviously, FSU is out of the hunt if Saturday night's game brings them a second ACC loss. Less obvious, though, is the fact that UVa will all but eliminate themselves from contention with their first ACC loss.
Assuming no major upsets along the way, the only game of importance remaining for these two teams is the Nov. 13th Miami/UVa game in Charlottesville. "Now," you might ask, "why would UVa be eliminated with a loss to FSU, they can still beat Miami to make it a three-way tie right?" Sure, that's a possibility, but in that scenario the conference title would go to FSU since they would (most likely) be ranked higher than UVa and Miami giving them the tiebreaker. Virginia can score a huge upset victory over the Hurricanes yet without beating their longtime nemesis 'Noles they will not be able to win the ACC title, and FSU, despite yet another humbling loss to the 'Canes will receive the automatic bid to the BCS.
It's unfortunate that games this early in the year can virtually end a team's chances for the conference crown, but in the New ACC - where the main goal is to get two teams into the BCS, rather than a competetive race for the conference title - the scenario is just what the doctor ordered. Playing the FSU/Miami game on Labor Day is good for ratings (and the two-team BCS possibility) but bad for a competetive conference in November. Expect more of the same in the future from the New ACC.
Posted at 11:05 am by stickman721
Permalink
Oct 8, 2004
OSU running back Vernand Morency's new public view
With the recent success of Oklahoma State running back, Vernand Morency, come past speculations of a former investigation involving a rape allegation.
As you will find in a recent ESPN article, Morency has been, for purposes of criminality, in apparent non-discovery of criminal level involvement of that crime.
For quite some time, in fact. Make it 1 1/2 years.
But, due to the timing of the media, the recent success of Morency and the nature of the terrible crime alleged in legal unbeknownst, Morency is about to relive the timeframe of that year-and-a-half ago.
Is it right for him to have to endure what some would call, 'journalistic pointlessness', even if only in the media alone?
Come on...
Is this a case of a college paper (and now more outlets) making this an old, 'whatever makes a popular and opinionated story', I ask?
Oh, yes, lest I forget the occasional beauties, and misfortunes, of the First Amendment rights of the Constitution...
Posted at 11:41 am by Chuck Kellerman
Permalink
Oct 4, 2004
Welcome To College Sports Central
A new site, A new forum for College Sports Fans. We invite you to join in. New Members Are Welcome!
Posted at 11:00 am by OurSports
Permalink
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |