With the recent success of Oklahoma State running back, Vernand Morency, come past speculations of a former investigation involving a rape allegation.

As you will find in a recent ESPN article, Morency has been, for purposes of criminality, in apparent non-discovery of criminal level involvement of that crime.

For quite some time, in fact. Make it 1 1/2 years. 

But, due to the timing of the media, the recent success of Morency and the nature of the terrible crime alleged in legal unbeknownst, Morency is about to relive the timeframe of that year-and-a-half ago.

Is it right for him to have to endure what some would call, 'journalistic pointlessness', even if only in the media alone?

Come on...

Is this a case of a college paper (and now more outlets) making this an old, 'whatever makes a popular and opinionated story', I ask?

Oh, yes, lest I forget the occasional beauties, and misfortunes, of the First Amendment rights of the Constitution...