Add to My Yahoo!


Oct 18, 2005
It's That Time of Year Again

October...

The nights are getting colder.  The leaves are starting to turn.  Baseball is slowly making its way towards another Fall Classic.  And sportswriters everywhere are dusting off their trusty "BSC SUX" and "We Need a Playoff!" stories.

Why are these sad, old, recycled stories suddenly being dumped in our laps again?  Because its BCS time again!

In case you somehow didn't notice, yet another year (the eighth by my count) of BCS rankings debuted on Monday.  Predictably, USC and Texas held the top two spots.  Also predictably, the whining started in earnest.  You know the arguments: "The BCS 'fails' every year, how will it fail this time?" or "A playoff is 'needed', that will solve all our problems."

Well, maybe I'm the only one left who actually believes this, but there is nothing wrong with the concept of the BCS.  It has never failed.  Let's approach these points one after the other:

First, the concept of the BCS is fine.  The formula may not be right after eight years of tweaking, but the concept of picking the best two of (now) 119 contenders and having them play for the title remains sound.  College Football is a season-long, single-elimination tournament; adding more layers would only dilute what is today a fantastic product.

Second, and I can't stress this enough, the BCS has never 'failed'.  The BCS was developed after the 1997 season to select and match up the best two teams from a field of contenders in the least biased way possible.  It has done just that every time.  You may argue that USC deserved to play in the 2003 Sugar Bowl or Auburn deserved to play in the 2004 Orange Bowl but that doesn't mean the system itself did not work.  If you want to argue that the current formula has brought too much bias back into the process, I'm right there with you.  But you can't argue that the system hasn't done what it was designed to do.

So as we turn towards home in another excellent, way-too-short College Football season, let's try to enjoy what we have rather than pine for what might never be.  Let's talk about what's great about this sport rather than write yet another re-hashed story on why the BCS isn't a playoff.

Posted at 07:35 pm by stickman721

Cornhuskie
November 25, 2005   11:30 PM PST
 
Justa difference in opinion, I guess.

The old BCS is much different than the new BCS, so allow it (the new) time to reap it's benefits, which used to be based on the obvious factors.

We (sports fans of college football) are much better served with this current system than ever before, IMO.

But even I think... the "Playoffs" are coming strong.
teespoon
October 20, 2005   11:12 PM PDT
 
did the BCS suceed when Nebraska went to the national championship game against miami?? were they really the #2 team in the nation??
While miami was the clear #1, the concept of #2 wasn't clearly addressed that year. I think by current BCS standardsm Oregon would have gone that year
I think the concept is great, but the way it is instituted is questionable
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments







Previous Entry Home Next Entry
 



   





 
<< October 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
















































 
Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed